Any ideas why my new RAM won't work?

[David]

Hello,

Can anyone suggest to me why my new RAM sticks won't work?

I had 3 x 128mb PC133 SDRAM.
I bought 3 x 256mb PC133 SDRAM to replace them.

The PC won't even boot up with them. I've tried one of the new with
two of the old etc. - every combination I can think of, but in vain.
I've had to go back to the 128s to be able to type this, obviously.

Someone told me there is an mb limit on each slot, depending on the
make of motherboard. I presumed that must be the cause, however I've
just downloaded a helpful little program called "SIW" (systems info
Windows) and it says:-

max. memory capacity = 764
max. memory module size = 256

This now makes me think I should have been able to have 256 in each
slot (if I've interpreted "module" correctly), and 256 x 3 = 764, so
I'm confused!

Is there any thing else I needed to change anywhere? E.g. those BIOS
settings?

Grateful for any ideas!

Thanks!

[Ken]

Post by David
Hello,
Can anyone suggest to me why my new RAM sticks won't work?
I had 3 x 128mb PC133 SDRAM.
I bought 3 x 256mb PC133 SDRAM to replace them.
The PC won't even boot up with them. I've tried one of the new with
two of the old etc. - every combination I can think of, but in vain.
I've had to go back to the 128s to be able to type this, obviously.
Someone told me there is an mb limit on each slot, depending on the
make of motherboard. I presumed that must be the cause, however I've
just downloaded a helpful little program called "SIW" (systems info
Windows) and it says:-
max. memory capacity = 764
max. memory module size = 256
This now makes me think I should have been able to have 256 in each
slot (if I've interpreted "module" correctly), and 256 x 3 = 764, so
I'm confused!
Is there any thing else I needed to change anywhere? E.g. those BIOS
settings?
Grateful for any ideas!
Thanks!

You should download the complete manual on your MB if you have not
already done so. Some MBs will not accept what is called high density
RAM. That is determined most often by how many ICs are on each stick.
This could be your problem. Get all the info possible before coming to
any conclusions.

[Mike Walsh]

Post by Ken

Post by David
Hello,
Can anyone suggest to me why my new RAM sticks won't work?
I had 3 x 128mb PC133 SDRAM.
I bought 3 x 256mb PC133 SDRAM to replace them.
The PC won't even boot up with them. I've tried one of the new with
two of the old etc. - every combination I can think of, but in vain.
I've had to go back to the 128s to be able to type this, obviously.
Someone told me there is an mb limit on each slot, depending on the
make of motherboard. I presumed that must be the cause, however I've
just downloaded a helpful little program called "SIW" (systems info
Windows) and it says:-
max. memory capacity = 764
max. memory module size = 256
This now makes me think I should have been able to have 256 in each
slot (if I've interpreted "module" correctly), and 256 x 3 = 764, so
I'm confused!
Is there any thing else I needed to change anywhere? E.g. those BIOS
settings?

You should download the complete manual on your MB if you have not
already done so. Some MBs will not accept what is called high density
RAM. That is determined most often by how many ICs are on each stick.
This could be your problem. Get all the info possible before coming to
any conclusions.

A DIMM with 8 chips should work properly. A DIMM with 4 chips might be recognized as half of its actual capacity. Your memory might not work because of a timing conflict. You might be able to change the BIOS settings to a more conservative setting. You might have to use a different brand of memory.

[David]

Post by Ken
You should download the complete manual on your MB if you have not
already done so. Some MBs will not accept what is called high density
RAM. That is determined most often by how many ICs are on each stick.
This could be your problem. Get all the info possible before coming to
any conclusions.

Thanks to all those who responded. Taking it back to the shop is a
last alternative, as I didn't buy them in my own town, and it's a bit
tricky getting back. But that's by the by. This concept of high and
low density is completely new to me, and I thought I'd make this my
first avenue of investigation.

I found from the internet the LOW is 64x8 and HIGH is 128x8. I don't
understand how these figures related to 256, but ignoring that for the
moment, it rung a bell. I HAVE seen (eg) 64x8 mentioned on an (old)
ram stick before, in amongst all the various serial nos. on the
sticker (sometimes several stickers!)

Unfortunately there is no such indication on these new sticks. I've
also spent a good half an hour browsing the net with the serial
number, and yes, I found dozens and dozens of references (usually from
shops!) but whilst they all said SDRAM, PC133 etc., not one single
person mentioned if it was a high or low density item.

I'm feeling right now that they must be high, and that my motherboard
does not cater for them (will start my search for a manual to confirm
that shortly) but all the same, I'd love to know if there is any other
way I can tell high from low? (In case I ever buy ram in the future,
new or used, and it doesn't say which).

Thanks.

[kony]

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:54:26 GMT,

Post by David

Post by Ken
You should download the complete manual on your MB if you have not
already done so. Some MBs will not accept what is called high density
RAM. That is determined most often by how many ICs are on each stick.
This could be your problem. Get all the info possible before coming to
any conclusions.

Thanks to all those who responded. Taking it back to the shop is a
last alternative, as I didn't buy them in my own town, and it's a bit
tricky getting back. But that's by the by. This concept of high and
low density is completely new to me, and I thought I'd make this my
first avenue of investigation.
I found from the internet the LOW is 64x8 and HIGH is 128x8. I don't
understand how these figures related to 256, but ignoring that for the
moment, it rung a bell. I HAVE seen (eg) 64x8 mentioned on an (old)
ram stick before, in amongst all the various serial nos. on the
sticker (sometimes several stickers!)
Unfortunately there is no such indication on these new sticks. I've
also spent a good half an hour browsing the net with the serial
number, and yes, I found dozens and dozens of references (usually from
shops!) but whilst they all said SDRAM, PC133 etc., not one single
person mentioned if it was a high or low density item.
I'm feeling right now that they must be high, and that my motherboard
does not cater for them (will start my search for a manual to confirm
that shortly) but all the same, I'd love to know if there is any other
way I can tell high from low? (In case I ever buy ram in the future,
new or used, and it doesn't say which).
Thanks.

It might help if you told us the motherboard make, model, or
at least the northbridge chipset it uses, and what processor
you have installed since that effects whether you actually
need PC133 or could use PC100.

Generally low density PC133 memory is rare these days, most
is labeled PC100 even if it could do 133MHz to strangely
denote compatibility with the typical systems that need low
density memory because most were only using up to 100MHz
memory bus speed.

What make and model of memory is this? Can you tell if
there are original memory chip manufacturer's chip codes on
the individual chips themselves, and if so then posting what
those are might help someone determine more about the
memory.

[David]

Post by kony
It might help if you told us the motherboard make, model, or
at least the northbridge chipset it uses, and what processor
you have installed since that effects whether you actually
need PC133 or could use PC100.
Generally low density PC133 memory is rare these days, most
is labeled PC100 even if it could do 133MHz to strangely
denote compatibility with the typical systems that need low
density memory because most were only using up to 100MHz
memory bus speed.
What make and model of memory is this? Can you tell if
there are original memory chip manufacturer's chip codes on
the individual chips themselves, and if so then posting what
those are might help someone determine more about the
memory.

Thanks again for the comments. (Btw, the whole lost cost me about 30
GBP / 605 USD, but I'm not too uptight about the cost - put it this
way, I've invested and wasted much more in PC matters in the past!)

I am a complete layman at this, so talk of (eg) northbridge is a bit
technical for me! I'm not even 100% sure what is meant by chip. If you
mean those black blocks, then they all have 8, just on one side. I
don't think I've ever (personally) come across any ram module that
wasn't, so that's news to me too.

I've hunted for the type (Kingston KTD-DM133) on the net, but again,
not one reference mentioned the density.

As for the motherboard, my little (not-as-reliable-now-as-I-thought)
program says it is:-

Intel SE440BX-2
Version AA720940-208
Serial GTS285050866

As I said earlier though, the online manual for SE440BX-2 did not
mention density (as far as I could see anyway).

David

[kony]

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:43:02 GMT,

Post by David

Post by kony
It might help if you told us the motherboard make, model, or
at least the northbridge chipset it uses, and what processor
you have installed since that effects whether you actually
need PC133 or could use PC100.
Generally low density PC133 memory is rare these days, most
is labeled PC100 even if it could do 133MHz to strangely
denote compatibility with the typical systems that need low
density memory because most were only using up to 100MHz
memory bus speed.
What make and model of memory is this? Can you tell if
there are original memory chip manufacturer's chip codes on
the individual chips themselves, and if so then posting what
those are might help someone determine more about the
memory.

Thanks again for the comments. (Btw, the whole lost cost me about 30
GBP / 605 USD, but I'm not too uptight about the cost - put it this
way, I've invested and wasted much more in PC matters in the past!)
I am a complete layman at this, so talk of (eg) northbridge is a bit
technical for me! I'm not even 100% sure what is meant by chip. If you
mean those black blocks, then they all have 8, just on one side. I
don't think I've ever (personally) come across any ram module that
wasn't, so that's news to me too.
I've hunted for the type (Kingston KTD-DM133) on the net, but again,
not one reference mentioned the density.
As for the motherboard, my little (not-as-reliable-now-as-I-thought)
program says it is:-
Intel SE440BX-2
Version AA720940-208
Serial GTS285050866
As I said earlier though, the online manual for SE440BX-2 did not
mention density (as far as I could see anyway).
David

Your memory is higher density than your motherboard, with
Intel 440BX chipset, supports. It will accept up to 256MB
per slot and 768MB total with 3 slots.

Since your motherboard does not support 133MHz memory bus,
you do not need PC133 memory and should buy PC100 instead.
While some PC133 memory will work, becauses there was a
brief period when most PC133 was low density, today the low
density PC133 memory is rare and no less expensive than the
PC100 low density type.

As mentioned previously, practically all reputable sellers
now most frequently use the term PC100 to denote the lower
density that your system needs. It will cost nearly twice
as much because being lower density it uses twice the number
of chips to achieve 256MB.

I suggest you seek a refund for this memory if possible and
consider whether it is worth the cost to upgrade the memory
when the money can be put towards replacement. At this
point the system is about 10 years old and while your
SE440BX motherboard was very good quality for it's time,
nothing lasts forever. At this point you may find parts
like the power supply or others are nearing the end of their
lifespan, again increasing cost, money that could be applied
towards a new system that you could more likely expect to
get another 10 years out of.

[jaster]

Post by kony
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:43:02 GMT,

It might help if you told us the motherboard make, model, or at least
the northbridge chipset it uses, and what processor you have installed
since that effects whether you actually need PC133 or could use PC100.
Generally low density PC133 memory is rare these days, most is labeled
PC100 even if it could do 133MHz to strangely denote compatibility with
the typical systems that need low density memory because most were only
using up to 100MHz memory bus speed.
What make and model of memory is this? Can you tell if there are
original memory chip manufacturer's chip codes on the individual chips
themselves, and if so then posting what those are might help someone
determine more about the memory.

Thanks again for the comments. (Btw, the whole lost cost me about 30 GBP
/ 605 USD, but I'm not too uptight about the cost - put it this way,
I've invested and wasted much more in PC matters in the past!)
I am a complete layman at this, so talk of (eg) northbridge is a bit
technical for me! I'm not even 100% sure what is meant by chip. If you
mean those black blocks, then they all have 8, just on one side. I don't
think I've ever (personally) come across any ram module that wasn't, so
that's news to me too.
I've hunted for the type (Kingston KTD-DM133) on the net, but again, not
one reference mentioned the density.
As for the motherboard, my little (not-as-reliable-now-as-I-thought)
program says it is:-
Intel SE440BX-2
Version AA720940-208
Serial GTS285050866
As I said earlier though, the online manual for SE440BX-2 did not
mention density (as far as I could see anyway).
David

Your memory is higher density than your motherboard, with Intel 440BX
chipset, supports. It will accept up to 256MB per slot and 768MB total
with 3 slots.
Since your motherboard does not support 133MHz memory bus, you do not
need PC133 memory and should buy PC100 instead. While some PC133 memory
will work, becauses there was a brief period when most PC133 was low
density, today the low density PC133 memory is rare and no less
expensive than the PC100 low density type.
As mentioned previously, practically all reputable sellers now most
frequently use the term PC100 to denote the lower density that your
system needs. It will cost nearly twice as much because being lower
density it uses twice the number of chips to achieve 256MB.
I suggest you seek a refund for this memory if possible and consider
whether it is worth the cost to upgrade the memory when the money can be
put towards replacement. At this point the system is about 10 years old
and while your SE440BX motherboard was very good quality for it's time,
nothing lasts forever. At this point you may find parts like the power
supply or others are nearing the end of their lifespan, again increasing
cost, money that could be applied towards a new system that you could
more likely expect to get another 10 years out of.

Wasn't that what I said???

The OP should open a Return Merchandise Ticket with Kingston Memory
support to exchange the PC133 for PC100. Their memory is guaranteed and
they should be able to provide working PC100 256 memory if he specifies
the correct motherboard manufacturer and model (SE440BX-2).

[David]

Post by jaster
The OP should open a Return Merchandise Ticket with Kingston Memory
support to exchange the PC133 for PC100.

Well that's something else I've learned - I thought that PC100 was
"old hat" and to be avoided - not so judging by recent comments.

Thanks again to all for the advice.

David

[kony]

On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:37:30 GMT,

Post by David

Post by jaster
The OP should open a Return Merchandise Ticket with Kingston Memory
support to exchange the PC133 for PC100.

Well that's something else I've learned - I thought that PC100 was
"old hat" and to be avoided - not so judging by recent comments.
Thanks again to all for the advice.
David

There was a time when this was true, back when PC133 first
came out it was the same memory, just chips spec'd capable
of running faster. Today the process is so good that any
random PC100 memory that was manufactured within the last 5
years or more will do 133MHz too, though it might require
adjusting the memory timings more conservatively to do so.

If you were overclocking your motherboard (if it had the
features to allow for it too which I don't think yours does)
then it would be more important to seek the rarer
low-density PC133 instead of typical PC100.

[Mike Fontenot]

Post by David
As for the motherboard, my little (not-as-reliable-now-as-I-thought)
program says it is:-
Intel SE440BX-2
Version AA720940-208
Serial GTS285050866

How did you get that info printed out? I recently bought a Dell
Inspiron 530, and I haven't been able to find out the make and model
number of my motherboard...I would REALLY like to have that info, and
the manual that goes with it.

Mike Fontenot

[kony]

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:37:31 -0600, Mike Fontenot

Post by Mike Fontenot

Post by David
As for the motherboard, my little (not-as-reliable-now-as-I-thought)
program says it is:-
Intel SE440BX-2
Version AA720940-208
Serial GTS285050866

How did you get that info printed out? I recently bought a Dell
Inspiron 530, and I haven't been able to find out the make and model
number of my motherboard...I would REALLY like to have that info, and
the manual that goes with it.
Mike Fontenot

Back then, things were easier IMO. SE440BX & rev.-2 was one
of the most popular OEM motherboards.

However, today we have Google, which found wikipedia, which
claims:

"When ordered with an Intel Q6600 Core 2 Quad processor, the
530 is equipped with a FoxConn G33m03 motherboard and a
LiteOn 375W power supply. When ordered in any other
configuration, the 530 is typically equipped with a FoxConn
G33m02 motherboard and a 300W Bestec power supply. The
G33m02 and G33m03 are essentially identical except for the
power regulation section of the motherboard. Essentially,
the G33m02 is a depopulated (cheaper) version of the board
which only has 6 voltage regulator IC's as opposed to the 11
voltage regulators on the G33m03. In practice, this means
that the G33m02 version of the motherboard is physically
incapable of providing enough current to operate the Intel
Q6600 CPU. In essence, if you do not order the Quad Core
processor with the system initially, you will NOT be able to
upgrade it to one later."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dell_Inspiron

So if that's correct, then your board should look at least a
little like the following (though cosmetic things like
heatsinks or color might differ),
http://www.foxconnchannel.com/product/Motherboards/detail_overview.aspx?ID=en-us0000319

IMO, pretty sneaky of Dell to change both motherboard and
power supply based on which processor is installed, if the
above is true.

[Mike Fontenot]

Many thanks, Kony. That was EXACTLY the information I needed. My
Inspiron user's manual is consistent with what you said, including a
warning about the motherboards being different for the quad-cpu versions
compared with all the other versions. My user's manual also says that
the non-quad versions have a 300w power supply, and the quad versions
have a 350w supply (a little less than the 375w supply in wiki)...Dell
had told me that I had a 350w supply, but I think that was probably bad
info, unless the user's manual is out of date.

The only downer in that link was that the FoxConn downloadable manual
looks like it has been compressed onto two pdf pages of microfilm, and
is almost illegible on my wife's MAC. But I've got an email into
FoxConn, and I might get my questions answered that way.

Thanks again for your help.

Mike Fontenot

Post by kony
"When ordered with an Intel Q6600 Core 2 Quad processor, the
530 is equipped with a FoxConn G33m03 motherboard and a
LiteOn 375W power supply. When ordered in any other
configuration, the 530 is typically equipped with a FoxConn
G33m02 motherboard and a 300W Bestec power supply. The
G33m02 and G33m03 are essentially identical except for the
power regulation section of the motherboard. Essentially,
the G33m02 is a depopulated (cheaper) version of the board
which only has 6 voltage regulator IC's as opposed to the 11
voltage regulators on the G33m03. In practice, this means
that the G33m02 version of the motherboard is physically
incapable of providing enough current to operate the Intel
Q6600 CPU. In essence, if you do not order the Quad Core
processor with the system initially, you will NOT be able to
upgrade it to one later."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dell_Inspiron
So if that's correct, then your board should look at least a
little like the following (though cosmetic things like
heatsinks or color might differ),
http://www.foxconnchannel.com/product/Motherboards/detail_overview.aspx?ID=en-us0000319
IMO, pretty sneaky of Dell to change both motherboard and
power supply based on which processor is installed, if the
above is true.

[kony]

On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:44:38 -0600, Mike Fontenot

Post by Mike Fontenot
Many thanks, Kony. That was EXACTLY the information I needed. My
Inspiron user's manual is consistent with what you said, including a
warning about the motherboards being different for the quad-cpu versions
compared with all the other versions. My user's manual also says that
the non-quad versions have a 300w power supply, and the quad versions
have a 350w supply (a little less than the 375w supply in wiki)...Dell
had told me that I had a 350w supply, but I think that was probably bad
info, unless the user's manual is out of date.
The only downer in that link was that the FoxConn downloadable manual
looks like it has been compressed onto two pdf pages of microfilm, and
is almost illegible on my wife's MAC. But I've got an email into
FoxConn, and I might get my questions answered that way.
Thanks again for your help.
Mike Fontenot

For what it's worth, they probably determined these specs
back when CPUs were 65nm process size. If you bought a 45nm
quad-core CPU, didn't overclock it, and didn't put a higher
end gaming video card into the system nor a lot of hard
drives, it should still be within the capacity of the
motherboard and PSU if they are reasonably designed.

[David]

Post by Mike Fontenot

Post by David
As for the motherboard, my little (not-as-reliable-now-as-I-thought)
program says it is:-
Intel SE440BX-2
Version AA720940-208
Serial GTS285050866

How did you get that info printed out? I recently bought a Dell
Inspiron 530, and I haven't been able to find out the make and model
number of my motherboard...I would REALLY like to have that info, and
the manual that goes with it.

Well the program is "SIW" (easily googled - free download). As I said,
at first I thought it was the Holy Grail, but now I take it with a
pinch of salt...... not just me, but my brother ran it as well - it
told him *his* PC's max. ram was 256, yet he has 384 already in it! So
use at your peril....!

David

[Mike Walsh]

Post by David

Post by Ken
You should download the complete manual on your MB if you have not
already done so. Some MBs will not accept what is called high density
RAM. That is determined most often by how many ICs are on each stick.
This could be your problem. Get all the info possible before coming to
any conclusions.

Thanks to all those who responded. Taking it back to the shop is a
last alternative, as I didn't buy them in my own town, and it's a bit
tricky getting back. But that's by the by. This concept of high and
low density is completely new to me, and I thought I'd make this my
first avenue of investigation.
I found from the internet the LOW is 64x8 and HIGH is 128x8. I don't
understand how these figures related to 256, but ignoring that for the
moment, it rung a bell. I HAVE seen (eg) 64x8 mentioned on an (old)
ram stick before, in amongst all the various serial nos. on the
sticker (sometimes several stickers!)
Unfortunately there is no such indication on these new sticks. I've
also spent a good half an hour browsing the net with the serial
number, and yes, I found dozens and dozens of references (usually from
shops!) but whilst they all said SDRAM, PC133 etc., not one single
person mentioned if it was a high or low density item.
I'm feeling right now that they must be high, and that my motherboard
does not cater for them (will start my search for a manual to confirm
that shortly) but all the same, I'd love to know if there is any other
way I can tell high from low? (In case I ever buy ram in the future,
new or used, and it doesn't say which).

High density and low density are relative terms. A chip that was considered high density a few years ago is now considered low density. A rule of thumb is a DIMM with 8 chips is considered low density (relative to the motherboard) and a DIMM with 4 or 2 chips is high density.

[jaster]

Post by Mike Walsh

Post by Ken
You should download the complete manual on your MB if you have not
already done so. Some MBs will not accept what is called high density
RAM. That is determined most often by how many ICs are on each stick.
This could be your problem. Get all the info possible before coming
to any conclusions.

Thanks to all those who responded. Taking it back to the shop is a last
alternative, as I didn't buy them in my own town, and it's a bit tricky
getting back. But that's by the by. This concept of high and low
density is completely new to me, and I thought I'd make this my first
avenue of investigation.
I found from the internet the LOW is 64x8 and HIGH is 128x8. I don't
understand how these figures related to 256, but ignoring that for the
moment, it rung a bell. I HAVE seen (eg) 64x8 mentioned on an (old) ram
stick before, in amongst all the various serial nos. on the sticker
(sometimes several stickers!)
Unfortunately there is no such indication on these new sticks. I've
also spent a good half an hour browsing the net with the serial number,
and yes, I found dozens and dozens of references (usually from shops!)
but whilst they all said SDRAM, PC133 etc., not one single person
mentioned if it was a high or low density item.
I'm feeling right now that they must be high, and that my motherboard
does not cater for them (will start my search for a manual to confirm
that shortly) but all the same, I'd love to know if there is any other
way I can tell high from low? (In case I ever buy ram in the future,
new or used, and it doesn't say which).

High density and low density are relative terms. A chip that was
considered high density a few years ago is now considered low density. A
rule of thumb is a DIMM with 8 chips is considered low density (relative
to the motherboard) and a DIMM with 4 or 2 chips is high density.

Number of chips does not indicate density.

[kony]

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:27:01 -0400, Mike Walsh

Post by Mike Walsh

Post by David
I'm feeling right now that they must be high, and that my motherboard
does not cater for them (will start my search for a manual to confirm
that shortly) but all the same, I'd love to know if there is any other
way I can tell high from low? (In case I ever buy ram in the future,
new or used, and it doesn't say which).

High density and low density are relative terms. A chip that was
considered high density a few years ago is now considered low density.

Agreed, chip density continued to climb and newer chipsets
continued to support that. Whether it was 66MHz, PC100,
133, DDR, DDR2, etc, were separate divisions occuring
concurrent to this perpetual density doubling over time.

Post by Mike Walsh
A rule of thumb is a DIMM with 8 chips is considered low density
(relative to the motherboard) and a DIMM with 4 or 2 chips is high density.

Not necessarily, in this case with PC133 his 256MB modules
have 8 chips. I have 128MB high density PC133 with 4 chips.

Generally, except for notebook SO-DIMMs it is becoming rare
for much volume of memory to be made that doesn't at least
take up the entirely of one side of the PCB... meaning 8
chips or 16. They certainly could make it with 4 but it
doesn't sell so well since all the inherant manufacturing,
distribution, and every other overhead still has to be paid
for so the result is doubling the module capacity from 4
chips to 8 can be a single digit # of dollars difference.

[jaster]

Post by David
Hello,
Can anyone suggest to me why my new RAM sticks won't work?
I had 3 x 128mb PC133 SDRAM.
I bought 3 x 256mb PC133 SDRAM to replace them.
The PC won't even boot up with them. I've tried one of the new with two
of the old etc. - every combination I can think of, but in vain. I've
had to go back to the 128s to be able to type this, obviously.
Someone told me there is an mb limit on each slot, depending on the make
of motherboard. I presumed that must be the cause, however I've just
downloaded a helpful little program called "SIW" (systems info Windows)
and it says:-
max. memory capacity = 764
max. memory module size = 256
This now makes me think I should have been able to have 256 in each slot
(if I've interpreted "module" correctly), and 256 x 3 = 764, so I'm
confused!
Is there any thing else I needed to change anywhere? E.g. those BIOS
settings?
Grateful for any ideas!
Thanks!

The new chips modules are too dense for the older motherboard. I'm sorry
can't remember the exact terms but 64x4 vs 128x4 or something.

Return the new memory for exchange asap, check your motherboard's memory
module density rating versus new memory before purchase. Not a guarantee
as I've had memory sticks of the same size and markings where 1 worked
the other didn't because module densities were different.

Your best option is to return the chips and for the money spent buy a new
motherboar/cpu combo and a 1GB or 2GB DDR.

You paid $200US for 3-256 PC133? versus $90US for motherboard/cpu combo
and $40US 2GB DDR.

[kony]

Post by jaster

Post by David
Hello,
Can anyone suggest to me why my new RAM sticks won't work?
I had 3 x 128mb PC133 SDRAM.
I bought 3 x 256mb PC133 SDRAM to replace them.
The PC won't even boot up with them. I've tried one of the new with two
of the old etc. - every combination I can think of, but in vain. I've
had to go back to the 128s to be able to type this, obviously.
Someone told me there is an mb limit on each slot, depending on the make
of motherboard. I presumed that must be the cause, however I've just
downloaded a helpful little program called "SIW" (systems info Windows)
and it says:-
max. memory capacity = 764
max. memory module size = 256
This now makes me think I should have been able to have 256 in each slot
(if I've interpreted "module" correctly), and 256 x 3 = 764, so I'm
confused!
Is there any thing else I needed to change anywhere? E.g. those BIOS
settings?
Grateful for any ideas!
Thanks!

The new chips modules are too dense for the older motherboard. I'm sorry
can't remember the exact terms but 64x4 vs 128x4 or something.
Return the new memory for exchange asap, check your motherboard's memory
module density rating versus new memory before purchase. Not a guarantee
as I've had memory sticks of the same size and markings where 1 worked
the other didn't because module densities were different.
Your best option is to return the chips and for the money spent buy a new
motherboar/cpu combo and a 1GB or 2GB DDR.
You paid $200US for 3-256 PC133? versus $90US for motherboard/cpu combo
and $40US 2GB DDR.

Maybe my eyes are going bad but where did he write that he'd
paid $200? 256MB/PC133 is about $15 a module, maybe a
little more in retail stores.

[jaster]

Post by jaster

Post by David
Hello,
Can anyone suggest to me why my new RAM sticks won't work?
I had 3 x 128mb PC133 SDRAM.
I bought 3 x 256mb PC133 SDRAM to replace them.
The PC won't even boot up with them. I've tried one of the new with
two of the old etc. - every combination I can think of, but in vain.
I've had to go back to the 128s to be able to type this, obviously.
Someone told me there is an mb limit on each slot, depending on the
make of motherboard. I presumed that must be the cause, however I've
just downloaded a helpful little program called "SIW" (systems info
Windows) and it says:-
max. memory capacity = 764
max. memory module size = 256
This now makes me think I should have been able to have 256 in each
slot (if I've interpreted "module" correctly), and 256 x 3 = 764, so
I'm confused!
Is there any thing else I needed to change anywhere? E.g. those BIOS
settings?
Grateful for any ideas!
Thanks!

The new chips modules are too dense for the older motherboard. I'm
sorry can't remember the exact terms but 64x4 vs 128x4 or something.
Return the new memory for exchange asap, check your motherboard's memory
module density rating versus new memory before purchase. Not a
guarantee as I've had memory sticks of the same size and markings where
1 worked the other didn't because module densities were different.
Your best option is to return the chips and for the money spent buy a
new motherboar/cpu combo and a 1GB or 2GB DDR.
You paid $200US for 3-256 PC133? versus $90US for motherboard/cpu combo
and $40US 2GB DDR.

Maybe my eyes are going bad but where did he write that he'd paid $200?
256MB/PC133 is about $15 a module, maybe a little more in retail stores.

How much in tax and shipping for the original? If he bought them online,
return shipping is ??? If the replacements don't work that's how much
more in shipping plus tax?

Bottom line, it doesn't matter how much he paid the memory doesn't work!

[kony]

Post by jaster

Post by jaster
You paid $200US for 3-256 PC133? versus $90US for motherboard/cpu combo
and $40US 2GB DDR.

Maybe my eyes are going bad but where did he write that he'd paid $200?
256MB/PC133 is about $15 a module, maybe a little more in retail stores.

How much in tax and shipping for the original? If he bought them online,
return shipping is ??? If the replacements don't work that's how much
more in shipping plus tax?
Bottom line, it doesn't matter how much he paid the memory doesn't work!

Buying online usually saves a significant amount of money
even considering the odds that a small percentage of that
savings would eventually be used to return something to the
seller.


Everyone who regularly deals with computer hardware accepts
that sooner or later (Or all the time) something will have
to be returned to the seller. What's the other alternative?
Having to drive to the brick and mortar store which costs
more time, gasoline and vehicle wear.

[jaster]

Post by jaster

Post by jaster
You paid $200US for 3-256 PC133? versus $90US for motherboard/cpu
combo and $40US 2GB DDR.

Maybe my eyes are going bad but where did he write that he'd paid
$200? 256MB/PC133 is about $15 a module, maybe a little more in retail
stores.

How much in tax and shipping for the original? If he bought them
online, return shipping is ??? If the replacements don't work that's how
much more in shipping plus tax?
Bottom line, it doesn't matter how much he paid the memory doesn't work!

Buying online usually saves a significant amount of money even
considering the odds that a small percentage of that savings would
eventually be used to return something to the seller.
Everyone who regularly deals with computer hardware accepts that sooner
or later (Or all the time) something will have to be returned to the
seller. What's the other alternative? Having to drive to the brick and
mortar store which costs more time, gasoline and vehicle wear.

Where I buy my components I get 14 days for cpu and memory and 30 days no
question return policy. And prices are usually better than the best
NewEgg price.

[kony]

Post by jaster

Buying online usually saves a significant amount of money even
considering the odds that a small percentage of that savings would
eventually be used to return something to the seller.
Everyone who regularly deals with computer hardware accepts that sooner
or later (Or all the time) something will have to be returned to the
seller. What's the other alternative? Having to drive to the brick and
mortar store which costs more time, gasoline and vehicle wear.

Where I buy my components I get 14 days for cpu and memory and 30 days no
question return policy. And prices are usually better than the best
NewEgg price.

Great, but if you don't tell us where you buy your
components then what good is it to know this?

If it's a local store, can we come live with you?

[unknown]

Some ram is broken when purchased. Most retailers will exchange.

Happened to me several times.

Post by David
Hello,
Can anyone suggest to me why my new RAM sticks won't work?
I had 3 x 128mb PC133 SDRAM.
I bought 3 x 256mb PC133 SDRAM to replace them.
The PC won't even boot up with them. I've tried one of the new with
two of the old etc. - every combination I can think of, but in vain.
I've had to go back to the 128s to be able to type this, obviously.
Someone told me there is an mb limit on each slot, depending on the
make of motherboard. I presumed that must be the cause, however I've
just downloaded a helpful little program called "SIW" (systems info
Windows) and it says:-
max. memory capacity = 764
max. memory module size = 256
This now makes me think I should have been able to have 256 in each
slot (if I've interpreted "module" correctly), and 256 x 3 = 764, so
I'm confused!
Is there any thing else I needed to change anywhere? E.g. those BIOS
settings?
Grateful for any ideas!
Thanks!